Top Five Critical Factors to be Considered While doing PhD Statistics
July 19, 2017
Compare the Testing Group Differences using T-tests, ANOVA and Non-Parametric Tests
November 21, 2017Sparking change: How statistical peer-reviewing is helping Researchers on Journal acceptance
Publishing a research paper in a peer reviewed journal seems to be one of the daunting tasks that require tackling multiple challenges on a technical and personal level. Researchers without prior experience in publishing would have a tough time understanding the nuances of acing journal acceptance rates for their research work. It is advisable for the early stage researchers to seek the expertise of Statistical peer reviewers who can help in incorporating the nuances to significantly improve journal acceptance rates.
Read on to know how the below mentioned factors handled by the expert Statistical peer review helps in journal acceptance.
The Publisher
Expert peer reviewers clearly understand the acceptance knacks and specifications of each publishing house and provide suggestions to modify the research paper accordingly to reap the best results.
Expectation of the audience
As these statistical peer reviewers have exceptional domain knowledge and exposure to the industry for a long time, they understand the audience that come with it and align the components of the research paper to be in line with the expectations of the audience.
[bctt tweet=”Sparking change: How statistical #peerreviewing is helping #Researchers on #Journal acceptance | Statswork” username=”statswork”]
1.Expert Suggestions
- Logic and hypothesis support
Experienced peer reviewers review the whole research paper from outsider perspective and will have different views about the work to be published. They provide their comments on claims stated in the paper and support with the feasibility of the logic and hypothesis from their experience and knowledge.
- Experimental design
They brainstorm about the experimental design of the research paper with the researcher and suggest including the final conclusions of the discussions which in turn would improve the journal acceptance rates.
2.Language and Grammatical
- Text clarity and flow
Statistical peer reviewer helps in the commenting about the tendency of the content to convey the exact meaning to the outsider and modifying the content in achieving text clarity. The flow of the research paper is also aligned to contribute to the clarity of the paper for better understanding and better acceptance.
- Grammatical errors
After all the discussed inclusions, the peer reviewer will check for grammatical errors in the document and correct them wherever necessary.
- Formatting
A final formatting (as per the standard accepted norms) is done to improve the readability of the document. These are the factors (which are sometimes ignored) that plays significant role in the improving the acceptance rates of the journals. Smart researchers would always consider seeking statistical peer review help as a mandatory closure to the research paper than an option.
